But because of the bright lights in the BG the convergence had to be set much further back which means that the movie "comes out of" the screen instead. pic.twitter.com/nItJMvnP6Y
— David F. Sandberg (@ponysmasher) February 25, 2020
I used to be a much bigger 3D fan. Loved my ViewMaster as a kid, loved my Nintendo 3DS as well as my old timey 3D viewer bought in an antique store. The concept of 3D is awesome. pic.twitter.com/4ATg43CpZu
— David F. Sandberg (@ponysmasher) February 25, 2020
For film though I think it's not really worth it unless you not only shoot 3D but also change your whole film language to adapt to 3D and take full advantage. And we really need a way of viewing it without glasses. It's all too much of a hassle currently.
— David F. Sandberg (@ponysmasher) February 25, 2020
I've seen a ton of movies in 3D but when I think back on them my memories are in 2D. I don't remember the 3D. Maybe that's just me though.
— David F. Sandberg (@ponysmasher) February 25, 2020
As a director I know it's expected for bigger movies to be in 3D and I don't have a problem with that. There's some really cool 3D stuff in Shazam. The priority for me will always be the 2D version though.
— David F. Sandberg (@ponysmasher) February 25, 2020
By the way, the people who convert movies really get the short end of the stick. VFX are finished last minute and they can't convert shots until then. They have to do a ton of very difficult work in very little time. Hats off to the 3D conversion folks!
— David F. Sandberg (@ponysmasher) February 25, 2020
Zdroj: David F. Sandberg_Twitter
Foto: Warner Bros.
